16 Blocks - Movie Review
16 Blocks 2006After our all too brief sojourn abroad, we felt it our duty to once again brave the withering banality of contemporary American films and venture forth to our local Cineplex to catch some of the flicks we had missed during our holiday. Turns out, we hadn’t missed much. Now, normally post-Oscar season, the major studios pretty much begin throwing out the celluloid garbage they had been sitting on all fall and winter long in the vain hopes of stealing a few dollars from the American public.
Congrats, you greedy bastards – you’ve really brought out the worst lately. After a cursory glance at the movie listings, we opted to go spend a couple of hours in the dark with our old pal, Bruce Willis. Yes, you heard that right. We have always considered Bruce to be a underrated actor who having taken the Harrison Ford career path to movie stardom via the regurgitation of police thrillers / action flicks / and the staple of the 90s lowest common denominator filmmaking – “the terrorist versus the rogue cop” flick. Well, his latest under the helm of Hollywood vet, Richard Donner may not be an arthouse flick but it does stack up surprisingly well compared with similar fodder.
“16 Blocks” is yet another police action flick in which Bruce is forced to act his age and then some by portraying a down on his luck police detective, who is four bottles of rye past quitting time. He is rummy eyed, two day beard growthed and paunchy belly’d up to instantly bludgeon us over the head with characterization. We get it. He’s seen better days.
On the eve of an all night job where he is saddled with the very difficult police work of watching over two dead Puerto Rican drug dealers – (some guys have all the luck, frankly we didn’t view the opening scene as being such a visual indication of how low Bruce’s character has fallen – hell, we would have ordered pizza, turned on the boob tube and polished off the remnants of the Columbia’s finest left to float away on the kitchen table.) But we digress. As Bruce’s wearied and bloodshot eyed dick ambles back to the precinct, he finds himself saddled with the pedestrian job of shuttling a petty crook / informant to the court to testify prior to a 10am deadline. All told he has 118 minutes to drive the snitch 16 blocks.

And that’s it. That’s the story. In a nutshell. Of course life is not so simple for Bruce’s character, Jack Mosley. For you see, the informant portrayed by Mos Def as the chattiest informant in the history of movies, saddled with a nasally whine which would make Rosie Perez cringe is one much sought after stoolie. It seems every dirty cop behind the Blue Line is gunning for him, since he threatens to reveal some very nasty details of corruption amongst New York’s Finest. Corrupt cops! In New York City? Crazy Talk!
Before you can say “Die Hard IV”, Bruce and snitch are outrunning a plethora of sweaty filthy cops, and not a hot one in the bunch. Shame. Although, the film does benefit greatly by casting a very under sung actor, David Morse as the ne plus ultra in the much abused and overused “evil cop” vein. There really isn’t very much to surprise you in the plot or characterization departments, and really we’ve seen all this a million times over.
So why did we find ourselves enjoying this flick? Three reasons:
1. Bruce Willis. Who miraculously manages to find the best moments in a slightly battered and bruised and been there screenplay to flesh out a believable character. Seriously, the old geezer still has star quality to burn!
2. Richard Donner. The aforementioned veteran director whose prolific career beginning with television westerns in the late 50s, and who later soared thru the best comic-book-to-film adaptation ever – 1978s “Superman”.
Sadly, Donner's career peaked early with two off kilter entries in his otherwise routine career.
The genre busting “Ladyhawke”- 1985 (a lovely-twisted-fantasy-swashbuckling-comedy-drama - although we could do without the 80s electronica / moog synthesizer score. Ugh.) and his quietest flick:
“Inside Moves” from 1980, a solid and moving examination of the outcasts of modern society featuring a young David Morse. While some people may enjoy his extremely popular yet mind numbingly silly “Lethal Weapon” series, or have some sick fascination with the abysmal “The Goonies” – we will chalk it up to their childhood nostalgia. Trust us, “The Goonies” is an awful movie. Grow up, you slackers. It fairly shocked the hell out of us, that while "16 Blocks" may not be his best flick ever, it is by far the best Donner has pulled off in the past twenty years.
And finally, the third reason we enjoyed this film – 3. The Visual Storytelling. Chalk it up to Donner and his film editor, Steve Mirkovich who manage to bring it in at a well paced ninety nine minutes, and who blessedly demonstrate tact and discretion in explaining some slight twists and turns in purely visual terms. No heavy handed explanations for the peanut gallery. No time out for any “for those of you to stupid to get what just happened . . .” moments.
While this film is certainly not going to win any awards, well maybe a Golden Globe or People’s Choice – it never takes us for granted. Well, okay. Maybe once or twice. There was really no need for the whole “I dream of being a baker, someday” subplot. But, we’ll let it go by. And yes, Mos Def’s vocal pitch is three dog whines above most human beings tolerance level, but he is charismatic enough of an actor to pull it off in the end. So, if you’re really desperate for a moviegoing experience, and your boytoy is begging you to go see a Dick Flick, you could do far worse than “16 Blocks”. There. What a rave review, huh? Bless you all!
Directed by Richard Donner
Written by Richard Wenk
Starring
Bruce Willis as Jack Mosley
Mos Def as Eddie Bunker
David Morse as Frank Nugent
Jenna Stern as Diane
Cinematography by Glen MacPherson
Film Editing by Steve Mirkovich
Original Music by Klaus Badelt
Production Design by Arvinder Grewal
Art Direction by Brandt Gordon
Set Decoration by Steve Shewchuk
Costume Design by Vicki Graef
Bonjour!
It served as the perfect tonic to help assuage our anger and lessen our disgust at the Academy’s worst Best Picture winner since “Gladiator”. Now, while there are so many things to enjoy when traipsing thru the cobblestoned streets of the
For us, the real joy and piece of mind of our far too short sojourn in La Belle France was the passion the French have for le Cinema! Now, as many of you know we reside in what is clearly the cultural capital of the New World - New York City. And while we have always enjoyed the Big Apple’s revival houses, we are here to tell you that they are completely overshadowed by the myriad choices to be found in Paris. The French rightly consider Film to be as genuine an artistic endeavor as the plastic arts. The Seventh Art as it is known. And what a blissful experience it was to watch all these films in reverential awe, with nary a 
“
Zowie! The bitch could really fill out a corset!
“
Featuring such 70s mainstays as
All this in a theatre that featured an image of the patron saint of movie lovers, the late great,
“
“
“Scarface”, seventy four years after it blazed its way onscreen in all its 
This scandalous tale of the education of a young girl into a high class slut, still holds up in part to it’s frothy score, real Parisian scenery (for the most part, but they did indeed film in Paris for the majority of the exteriors and the famous scenes at the reknowned
For you see, after the film we were treated to a magical, enchanting and straight out of the movies in person chat with the star of “Gigi” – Mademoiselle Leslie Caron herself! Running a few minutes late due to the parking (hmmmm, probably due to
It almost made us forget the nightmare of the Oscars. Almost. À bientôt! Bless you all! 
Here is the perfect family film. If you want to abandon your children by the side of the road in exchange for a quick buck. And who hasn’t lived through that scenario? Belgium’s famed
The father is played with a perfect eye on casting by
The young mother is portrayed by Déborah François as a crumpled together but surprisingly proud woman who is clearly in love with her hobo lifestyle and in particular the rarely seen charms of Bruno. Their lives together barely change once their son enters it. Leaving the hospital with barely a care in tow, the mother – Sonia is completely at ease having to sleep by the damp riverside as long as Bruno is with her. The child is obviously being cared for, but hardly the center of the conversation. This might not be the film for most young parents to go see. François is utterly believable as an easily taken-in young woman who discovers her own sense of worth - albeit a bit too late - by trusting the primal instincts of motherhood.
While the subject matter is less than alluring, the film is indeed a wonderfully effective examination into the lives of some desperate people, whose level of despair is hardly hinted at until the key moment. For Bruno in his shady dealings of selling anything he can grab his hands on casually mentions to one of his connections that he is the not-so-proud father of a new infant. The trash broker innocuously replies that babies can bring a lot of cash on the black market, and so Bruno not only absorbs the information but soon gives it the ole college dropout try and agrees to sell his son for some nice chunk of Euros. The only problem of course is that he fails to mention it to the mother of his child. Taking the opportunity while babysitting for the afternoon, he indeed swaps the kid for the money and attempts to casually inform Sonia of the transaction only once it has been completed.
Not only does Sonia not want any part of the ordeal, she kicks into fierce lioness mode and practically murders Bruno for the crime. Her overwhelming sense of anguish soon lands her in the nearest hospital in a near coma of grief. Bruno launches into a last minute frenzy to recover his child that escalates into a separate crime gone wrong that involves his younger accomplices and sends his already miserable life spiraling completely out of control.
Now, doesn’t that sound cheery? Well, no it isn’t. But what it is, is damn good filmmaking. The director brothers portray all the down low denizens as human beings and not mere characters. They may have incredible flaws as far as their sense of duty or morality, but these are not people who rest around contemplating their lives or the wonders of the universe. They exist by subsisting. There day to day is something most of us will never know or attempt to understand. By delving into the storyline without sentimentality or melodramatics, the directors understand that any life can be fascinating if it feels real enough to the viewer.
What makes this film more than tolerable, and even enjoyable insofar as the subject matter is shockingly abrasive is the directorial control. This is not a melodrama, nor is it some diatribe on the underprivileged. It is near impossible to feel pity for these characters, well perhaps for the enfant in question, but we remain absorbed by their story. This is truly the work of a fine pair of directors who understand pacing, storytelling and who hold their camera at a distance close enough to scrutinize the pitiable lot without indulging in grand theatrics.
While these may not be people you want to befriend, or even stop long enough to toss a coin to – they do exist. To some, the film might recall the great Agnes Varda’s “
Written & Directed by Jean-Pierre Dardenne & Luc Dardenne

The set-up is quite simple. A bank robbery in lower Manhattan is underway when Denzel Washington and the incredibly talented
What follows is the slow, and we do mean slow unraveling of the heist. The film doesn’t crawl at a snail pace, Spike is too polished a pro to let that happen. But it does meander and slowly loses its way along its conventional bank heist genre groove. Several scenes serve only to underscore the wandering nature of the narrative. While we agree that today’s video games are
Since the film is told thru a series of flashbacks, we know that all the major players will survive the finale – what is left is the how and why. And while the how is sometimes interesting, the why is nothing short of ignored. There is no particular reason for the subplot involving Christopher Plummer’s secret stash, except to help us speculate that he must have been around the age of twelve when it was first tucked away behind lock and key. Seriously people,
But this is a slight quibble when it comes to the overall success or failure of the film. It is made handsomely enough, with a real attempt at creative and visual storytelling. It just happens to rely on a weak script that could easily have been sharpened and shortened by a good forty pages. At a running time of two hours and ten minutes, we were beginning to feel we had been taken hostages ourselves. Although that might not have been a bad thing with Clive Owen pointing a
Since the success of the film relies largely on the strengths of its lead players, Spike should be commended for his central casting. With the exception of 
And speaking of talent, this flick features a nice return to form by Jodie Foster as the mysterious Madeline White. Here is a seemingly all powerful creature that
While we would have appreciated the flick more if it had been tightened and honed as nicely as Jodie’s calves, we still enjoyed our time with the “Inside Man”. So what the hell, crack your wallets open and go. Bless you all!
In 1605, King James I of England’s Protestant court was almost decimated by a wily team of Catholic rebels’ intent on bringing down the monarchy and reestablishing Catholicism as the religion of the realm.
The latest effects laden opus brought to us courtesy of the
In the film’s fascist future, the United States of America is officially dead to the world, its people busy fighting a grisly Civil War. The free world has been decimated by a worldwide struggle against terrorism. A conservative government faction rose to the attention during the melee and took over - leveraging the fear that simple folk had against terrorism. They invaded countries
While we have been enraptured in the past with some very fine adaptations based on graphic novels / comic books: “
The plot is fairly straightforward and fairly derivative of far better “What If?” scenarios about a possible totalitarian. Not only do “
As with many dark future scenarios – the repressive government is under attack by an underground freedom force movement intent on toppling the fascist regime. In a nod to British history (here is where our brief history lesson above comes into play.), the mysterious robe clad figure intent on restoring free thought is disguised in a Guy Fawkes mask and has apparently trained with
While we never get a glimpse behind the mask, the vocal performance by
While Hugo’s wonderful vocal turn works beautifully, Natalie Portman suffers from a slight case of miscasting. Natalie Portman has been
The supporting cast thankfully is composed of several extremely talented actors from the British Isles.
His partner is our long ago dreamboat,
The role of a popular television personality struggling to keep his sexuality a secret under the homophobic government is parlayed by that witty and talented
And perhaps a knowing wink or two. For the role of the Nazi-like regime’s dictator is essayed by
Unfortunately for the film and for us, the powers that be were not capable of finding a director of any worth. We had no bloody clue who James McTeigue was. After a brief search –
“V for Vendetta” is the kind of flick that has its heart in the right place, and its head up it own arse. While who amongst us wouldn’t support the right to freely express our opinion, and who doesn’t cheer for the underdog vigilante hero? But by the time this tired fantasy thriller had wound up to its listlessly predictable explosive ending, we were cheering for the bomb. We only wish they had spared the

